- Posts: 6
- Thank you received: 0
my second stupid question
- gladiatorhw
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
Less
More
20 years 10 months ago #2706
by gladiatorhw
my second stupid question was created by gladiatorhw
how many telent sessions can take place simulaneously on a router running a standard edition of the IOS?why?
20 years 10 months ago #2710
by sahirh
Sahir Hidayatullah.
Firewall.cx Staff - Associate Editor & Security Advisor
tftfotw.blogspot.com
Replied by sahirh on topic Re: my second stupid question
Well IOS provides 5 virtual terminals if I remember correctly..
thats why you use the command
vty 0 4
to configure the telnet interfaces.
thats why you use the command
vty 0 4
to configure the telnet interfaces.
Sahir Hidayatullah.
Firewall.cx Staff - Associate Editor & Security Advisor
tftfotw.blogspot.com
- gladiatorhw
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
Less
More
- Posts: 6
- Thank you received: 0
20 years 10 months ago #2712
by gladiatorhw
Replied by gladiatorhw on topic Re: my second stupid question
yes,but I think not so easy .I am so puzzled .after all ,it's one question in cisco exam!may be you are right!
20 years 10 months ago #2713
by Chris
Chris Partsenidis.
Founder & Editor-in-Chief
www.Firewall.cx
Replied by Chris on topic Re: my second stupid question
A Note here, the new IOS's now provide upto 16 telnet sessions as opposed to 5 in the older ones !!
This means you now have from VTY 0 to 15 !
If I remember correctly .. the above changes apply from versions 12.0 or 12.2 and upwards.
This means you now have from VTY 0 to 15 !
If I remember correctly .. the above changes apply from versions 12.0 or 12.2 and upwards.
Chris Partsenidis.
Founder & Editor-in-Chief
www.Firewall.cx
20 years 10 months ago #2714
by sahirh
Sahir Hidayatullah.
Firewall.cx Staff - Associate Editor & Security Advisor
tftfotw.blogspot.com
Replied by sahirh on topic Re: my second stupid question
Now thats something I didn't know.. so when you configure you have to go
vty 0 15 ?
Hehe so if people didn't change their configuration from the old 11.x configs to the new IOS version.... they would not have configured all the vtys.... right ?
Btw gladiator.. its quite a typical Cisco question.. they can ask some really lame questions and you get tricked into thinking 'it can't be this easy'..
vty 0 15 ?
Hehe so if people didn't change their configuration from the old 11.x configs to the new IOS version.... they would not have configured all the vtys.... right ?
Btw gladiator.. its quite a typical Cisco question.. they can ask some really lame questions and you get tricked into thinking 'it can't be this easy'..
Sahir Hidayatullah.
Firewall.cx Staff - Associate Editor & Security Advisor
tftfotw.blogspot.com
20 years 10 months ago #2760
by mew
I have not had the chance to work a lot with 12.1 and above yet. I do know that on a router with 12.0 the vty is still 0 4. On switches it is 0 15. I would not consider a layer 3 switch as a router.
Also, I did a quick search on www.cisco.com and found evidence that at least up to 12.1 a router is still VTY 0 4. Switchs are VTY 0 15.
Also, I did a quick search on www.cisco.com and found evidence that at least up to 12.1 a router is still VTY 0 4. Switchs are VTY 0 15.
Time to create page: 0.130 seconds