- Posts: 12
- Thank you received: 0
Collision Domains
20 years 5 months ago #4211
by imonfya
Collision Domains was created by imonfya
Are collision domains good or bad? An can someone explain why please. Thanks
20 years 5 months ago #4214
by TheBishop
Replied by TheBishop on topic Collision Domains
Collisions are integral to the way Ethernet works, so I suppose you could say they are good, because if Ethernet didn't work most of us would be out of a job!
A big, in-depth discussion is probably not the right thing to do in a post, but if you want more (much, much more) detail, have a look at the excellent Ethernet tutorial under the Networking menu at the top of the Firewall.cx site page
However, to try to directly address your point, what you want when using Ethernet is a collision domain that is not too big. If you have too many devices and/or too 'long' a segment then you get too many collisions occuring and so get worse performance. Hence the use of bridges and/or switches to break the network up into smaller collision domains
A big, in-depth discussion is probably not the right thing to do in a post, but if you want more (much, much more) detail, have a look at the excellent Ethernet tutorial under the Networking menu at the top of the Firewall.cx site page
However, to try to directly address your point, what you want when using Ethernet is a collision domain that is not too big. If you have too many devices and/or too 'long' a segment then you get too many collisions occuring and so get worse performance. Hence the use of bridges and/or switches to break the network up into smaller collision domains
20 years 5 months ago #4235
by sahirh
Sahir Hidayatullah.
Firewall.cx Staff - Associate Editor & Security Advisor
tftfotw.blogspot.com
Replied by sahirh on topic Re: Collision Domains
smaller collision domains = good thing
large collision domains = bad thing
large collision domains = bad thing
Sahir Hidayatullah.
Firewall.cx Staff - Associate Editor & Security Advisor
tftfotw.blogspot.com
Time to create page: 0.118 seconds