- Posts: 20
- Thank you received: 0
Swicth Topology-Failover vs Performance
12 years 2 months ago #38121
by koslyr
Swicth Topology-Failover vs Performance was created by koslyr
I want to connect a mid-platform (2 Web Servers , 2 Database-Servers, 1 SAN) to my enterprise network where exists three Cisco Switches.
For the moment i have two main topologies to choose to implement.
The first one has an inter-link between the Switches in order to provide a redundancy path.
At the second topology there is not redundancy at Switch level, but there is an additional link (bandwidth) towards upper aggregation Switch.
Which of these two topologies seems to be better according to yours opinion and experience?
At the second topology is it possible to arise connectivity problems due to two-way paths of each web-server to the two Switches?
For the moment i have two main topologies to choose to implement.
The first one has an inter-link between the Switches in order to provide a redundancy path.
At the second topology there is not redundancy at Switch level, but there is an additional link (bandwidth) towards upper aggregation Switch.
Which of these two topologies seems to be better according to yours opinion and experience?
At the second topology is it possible to arise connectivity problems due to two-way paths of each web-server to the two Switches?
Attachments:
12 years 2 months ago #38126
by chrnxR
the dreams of yesterday are the hopes of today and the reality of tomorrow.
-Robert H. Goddard
Replied by chrnxR on topic Re: Swicth Topology-Failover vs Performance
hey koslyr,
If you can't go for both, redundancy and bandwith, i'd always prefer to choose the redundancy solution so no one can blame you if the worst case happens.
safety first :laugh:
-chrnxR
If you can't go for both, redundancy and bandwith, i'd always prefer to choose the redundancy solution so no one can blame you if the worst case happens.
safety first :laugh:
-chrnxR
the dreams of yesterday are the hopes of today and the reality of tomorrow.
-Robert H. Goddard
Time to create page: 0.131 seconds