Skip to main content

Supernet question

More
15 years 9 months ago #29468 by Smurf
Replied by Smurf on topic Re: Supernet question

Thank you very much. I understood these. Thanx a lot.. :D :D :D :D

Can i ask something else?
"Class C networks 192.168.32.0 and 192.168.33.0 could
be combined to create 192.168.32.0/23."

Can these be solved like:

2^n=2 -> n=1 bit

Default sm c class: 255.255.255.0
New sm: 255.255.11111110.00000000
Dec: 255.255.254.0

or its wrong? :( I was having exams 2 hours ago.. the first part was like the one you solved... and the other was like the one i solve here. I suppose its correct? He will give me the half exercise correct :( I didnt saw this on time... but its ok. thank you.


Looks good to me ;)

Wayne Murphy
Firewall.cx Team Member
www.firewall.cx

Now working for a Security Company called Sec-1 Ltd in the UK, for any
Penetration Testing work visit www.sec-1.com or PM me for details.
More
15 years 9 months ago #29471 by Ophelia
Replied by Ophelia on topic Re: Supernet question
thank you:) and how can i understand when to use your way or my way? my way is correct for the /23 but not for the /24.
More
15 years 9 months ago #29481 by Smurf
Replied by Smurf on topic Re: Supernet question
I have always done it by finding the step, then its easy to find the start of each subnet.

/24 will move to the next octet for the host addresses so its not really needed because you are dealing with the whole octect.

Wayne Murphy
Firewall.cx Team Member
www.firewall.cx

Now working for a Security Company called Sec-1 Ltd in the UK, for any
Penetration Testing work visit www.sec-1.com or PM me for details.
Time to create page: 0.118 seconds