Turning off spanning tree
18 years 11 months ago #12041
by TheBishop
Turning off spanning tree was created by TheBishop
Hi folks
I might have a requirement to completely disable spanning tree on a Cisco switch. What is the best way to achieve this? I know I can apply spanning-tree portfast to individual ports, but does this really turn spanning tree off?
Also there is an Etherchannel set up between this switch and its neighbour. Does the Etherchannel need spanning tree to work properly or does it have some other mechanism?
Thanks in advance
I might have a requirement to completely disable spanning tree on a Cisco switch. What is the best way to achieve this? I know I can apply spanning-tree portfast to individual ports, but does this really turn spanning tree off?
Also there is an Etherchannel set up between this switch and its neighbour. Does the Etherchannel need spanning tree to work properly or does it have some other mechanism?
Thanks in advance
18 years 11 months ago #12052
by jwj
-Jeremy-
Replied by jwj on topic Re: Turning off spanning tree
Portfast does not disable spanning tree, instead it modifies the process so that the port skips to forwarding. A way to ensure that a switch, hub, etc. is not plugged into a portfast switchport and cause problems is the use of bpdu guard. That way, if BPDUs are received on the port, it will be err-disabled. As far as etherchannels, they are considered one link to spanning tree, so yes, spanning tree runs over etherchannels too.
To turn off spanning tree, you have to do it on a per VLAN basis.
example:
switch(config)#no spanning-tree vlan 1
To turn off spanning tree, you have to do it on a per VLAN basis.
example:
switch(config)#no spanning-tree vlan 1
-Jeremy-
18 years 11 months ago #12081
by TheBishop
Replied by TheBishop on topic Soanning tree
Thanks Jeremy
So I guess that means that an Etherchannel will still work correctly even if spanning tree is completely disabled?
So I guess that means that an Etherchannel will still work correctly even if spanning tree is completely disabled?
18 years 11 months ago #12086
by jwj
-Jeremy-
Replied by jwj on topic Re: Turning off spanning tree
I've never tried that before, so I wouldn't know for sure. The worst that could happen is one of the etherchannel ports could get blocked.
-Jeremy-
18 years 11 months ago #12099
by Chris
Chris Partsenidis.
Founder & Editor-in-Chief
www.Firewall.cx
Replied by Chris on topic Re: Turning off spanning tree
Bishop,
Ether-channel should still work without a problem when spanning tree is disabled. You just need to ensure you don't have any network loops to avoid running around trying to catch the 'looping' packets
By the way, why are you looking into disabling STP?
Ether-channel should still work without a problem when spanning tree is disabled. You just need to ensure you don't have any network loops to avoid running around trying to catch the 'looping' packets
By the way, why are you looking into disabling STP?
Chris Partsenidis.
Founder & Editor-in-Chief
www.Firewall.cx
18 years 11 months ago #12105
by TheBishop
It's a stupid idea really. We have a hardware encryption unit connected between a mini-LAN made up of two switches with an Etherchannel between them and our main LAN switch stack. We're seeing some problems with the encryptor which I think is software related but the supplier is trying to blame our hardware. One of their 'recommendations' is to disable spanning tree in case the port up/down during state changes is upsetting their unit. I can do it since I don't have any loops in the infrastructure but I don't think it will make a blind bit of difference
Time to create page: 0.131 seconds