- Posts: 7
- Thank you received: 0
RIP - Least possible Hop Count
- ajathsatru
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
Less
More
18 years 1 month ago #17460
by ajathsatru
RIP - Least possible Hop Count was created by ajathsatru
I have a basic doubt on RIP. My friend just told me that the minimum hop count for the RIP is 1 and maximum is 15, which I got confirmed from the following cisco page
www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/ito_doc/rip.htm
But the article on Distance Vector Routing Protocol ( www.firewall.cx/distance_vector.php ) says the if a network is directly connected to the router's interface then it will have a hop count value of zero(0) in the router's table entry.
Since RIP works on the principle of Distance Vector Routing Protocol, I thought that RIP too will have a minimum hop count value of zero(0). But this is not the case.
Can anyone clarify on this.
www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/ito_doc/rip.htm
But the article on Distance Vector Routing Protocol ( www.firewall.cx/distance_vector.php ) says the if a network is directly connected to the router's interface then it will have a hop count value of zero(0) in the router's table entry.
Since RIP works on the principle of Distance Vector Routing Protocol, I thought that RIP too will have a minimum hop count value of zero(0). But this is not the case.
Can anyone clarify on this.
18 years 1 month ago #17470
by Smurf
Wayne Murphy
Firewall.cx Team Member
www.firewall.cx
Now working for a Security Company called Sec-1 Ltd in the UK, for any
Penetration Testing work visit www.sec-1.com or PM me for details.
Replied by Smurf on topic Re: RIP - Least possible Hop Count
Hmm, interesting. Appologies as this isn't yet an area of expertise (currently studying for CCNP).
Anyhow, since RIP is for dynamically updating routing information in routers, would RIP be classed as being applied for local subnets that are physically connected to the router. Surely the RIP packets are sent to neighbouring routers and thus would have a setting of 1 when sent through to the routers one hop away ?
Just a though ?
Cheers
Anyhow, since RIP is for dynamically updating routing information in routers, would RIP be classed as being applied for local subnets that are physically connected to the router. Surely the RIP packets are sent to neighbouring routers and thus would have a setting of 1 when sent through to the routers one hop away ?
Just a though ?
Cheers
Wayne Murphy
Firewall.cx Team Member
www.firewall.cx
Now working for a Security Company called Sec-1 Ltd in the UK, for any
Penetration Testing work visit www.sec-1.com or PM me for details.
18 years 1 month ago #17480
by Gosbollen
Replied by Gosbollen on topic Re: RIP - Least possible Hop Count
I think you are mixing up hop count with administrative distance values:
0= directly connected
1= static route
100= IGRP
120= RIP
etc etc etc.
Hop count is as easy as it sounds: 1 per hop.
Router1 sends a RIP packet to Router 3. Below is the hop count values in the RIP-packet.
Router1
Router2
Router3
Count: 0
Count: 1
Count: 2
0= directly connected
1= static route
100= IGRP
120= RIP
etc etc etc.
Hop count is as easy as it sounds: 1 per hop.
Router1 sends a RIP packet to Router 3. Below is the hop count values in the RIP-packet.
Router1
Router2
Router3
Count: 0
Count: 1
Count: 2
18 years 1 month ago #17529
by Dove
Dove
Replied by Dove on topic Re: RIP - Least possible Hop Count
The hope count will be calculated as once the packet took an inbound & outbound in a router then it will considered as a hop.
That is if you the packet need to reach from RouterA to RouterC then
RotuerA
>RouterB
>routerC
here the packet RouterA is travilling through the inbound of RouterB as well as outbounded from RouterB and then it reaching its destination RouterC. Hence the packet took only one complete Inbound & outbound in only one router (RouterB) so this network having only one hop count.
Will take one more example.
RotuerA
>RouterB
>routerC
>RouterD
here will take that the packet needs to reach RouterD. Then the packet will pass two router's (in & out bound interfaces) to reach the destination. Hence this network having the hop count 2.
Hope it will clear your doubt.
That is if you the packet need to reach from RouterA to RouterC then
RotuerA
>RouterB
>routerC
here the packet RouterA is travilling through the inbound of RouterB as well as outbounded from RouterB and then it reaching its destination RouterC. Hence the packet took only one complete Inbound & outbound in only one router (RouterB) so this network having only one hop count.
Will take one more example.
RotuerA
>RouterB
>routerC
>RouterD
here will take that the packet needs to reach RouterD. Then the packet will pass two router's (in & out bound interfaces) to reach the destination. Hence this network having the hop count 2.
Hope it will clear your doubt.
Dove
18 years 1 month ago #17541
by Gosbollen
Replied by Gosbollen on topic Re: RIP - Least possible Hop Count
RotuerA
>RouterB
>routerC
>RouterD
Would be a hop count of 3
www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/ito_doc/rip.htm
>RouterB
>routerC
>RouterD
Would be a hop count of 3
When a router receives a routing update that contains a new or changed destination network entry, the router adds 1 to the metric value indicated in the update and enters the network in the routing table.
www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/ito_doc/rip.htm
18 years 1 month ago #17554
by havohej
Replied by havohej on topic Re: RIP - Least possible Hop Count
clear as the water, and dont try to be repetitive tive tive tive...
but if it is still not clear, in the last diagram you must understand!
RotuerA
link1---->RouterB
>routerC
>RouterD
link1 or subnet1 between router A and router B has a hop count of 2 from the Router D point of view or routing table.
but if it is still not clear, in the last diagram you must understand!
RotuerA
link1---->RouterB
>routerC
>RouterD
link1 or subnet1 between router A and router B has a hop count of 2 from the Router D point of view or routing table.
Time to create page: 0.131 seconds